Cancer genomics18 min14 August 2026

Why test a tumour genome—and when it can change treatment

Molecular analysis does not seek abstract ‘cancer mutations’; it seeks testable biomarkers of sensitivity, resistance, inherited risk and research hypotheses.

TYPE AND BOUNDARYEditorial clinical synthesis · decisions belong to the oncology team

ONE-MINUTE SUMMARY

  • Tumour DNA differs from a person’s inherited DNA.
  • A variant is useful only with tumour type, stage, line and evidence level.
  • A scientifically interesting target is not the same as an available or authorised treatment.
01

1. What is actually tested

DNA is extracted from tumour tissue or plasma containing circulating tumour DNA; RNA may be needed for expression and fusions. The laboratory compares sequence to a reference and, in paired testing, to a separately collected non-tumour specimen from the patient. The result describes the sampled material and disease time point: metastases and later relapse can differ.

02

2. Short variants, copy number and rearrangements

SNVs and indels can activate a driver or disrupt a suppressor. Amplification increases copy number, deletion removes sequence, and a functional fusion can create an oncogenic transcript or active kinase. EGFR exon 19 deletion, ERBB2 amplification and an ALK fusion are therefore distinct biological events requiring appropriate assays.

03

3. Composite biomarkers: MSI, TMB and HRD

MSI/dMMR reflects mismatch-repair deficiency and can be assessed by PCR, NGS or MMR-protein IHC. TMB is a platform-dependent mutation count per megabase. HRD describes homologous-recombination deficiency, but a BRCA variant, an HRR panel and a genomic-scar assay are not interchangeable.

04

4. Why targeted medicines become possible

When tumour growth depends on an activated protein, a medicine may block that dependency. Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors are used for selected activating EGFR, ALK, ROS1, RET, NTRK, BRAF, FGFR and other alterations. Antibodies and conjugates can depend on HER2 expression or amplification, while PARP inhibitors depend on a defined BRCA/HRD context. The exact relationship varies by tumour and jurisdiction.

05

5. A biomarker can exclude a treatment

Not every finding opens a treatment. Activating KRAS/NRAS in metastatic colorectal cancer predicts lack of benefit from some anti-EGFR medicines; selected secondary EGFR or ALK alterations are linked to resistance. A negative predictive biomarker can be as clinically important as a positive one.

06

6. Immunotherapy and genomic signals

MSI-H/dMMR and, in selected indications, TMB-high can support discussion of immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Immune response is not reducible to one number: tumour type, PD-L1, prior treatment, authorised indication and assay limitations matter.

07

7. A tumour finding can trigger germline testing

Pathogenic BRCA1/2, PALB2, TP53, MMR and other tumour variants can sometimes be germline. A high allele fraction is only a clue; tumour-only analysis does not establish origin. Inheritance requires a separate germline specimen, consent and genetic counselling. The result can affect surveillance and relatives.

08

8. Where clinical evidence ends and research begins

Actionability is strongest when biomarker and treatment are supported in the same tumour and setting. Evidence from another tumour, an early-phase study, isolated responses, a preclinical model, an unknown variant or an algorithmic combination prediction belongs to a research tier. It may support trial search but must not look like standard prescribing.

09

9. Why a matched medicine may still fail

A tumour contains different clones, can use bypass pathways and evolves under treatment pressure. A target may exist in only some cells, while co-alterations suppress response. A molecular match can strengthen a treatment discussion but cannot guarantee benefit.

EDITORIAL PASSPORT

Publisher
OOO NPO Nauchnye Tekhnologii
Format
Editorial evidence review
Sources checked
Sources
7

Named external review is disclosed only after documented completion. Factual or scientific errors can be reported through the editorial route.

Found an error?

REFERENCES

Sources behind the review.

  1. NCI biomarker testing
  2. ESMO NGS recommendations 2024
  3. ESMO genomic reporting 2024
  4. ESCAT clinical actionability scale
  5. FDA companion diagnostics
  6. ESMO ctDNA recommendations
  7. ESMO tumour-only germline follow-up
USE BOUNDARY

This review explains evidence and questions for a clinician. It does not interpret an individual DNA file, diagnose or prescribe treatment.