Carrier screening
- WHAT IT MEANS
- Looks for carrier status for selected recessive and X-linked conditions before or during pregnancy.
- BOUNDARY
- A negative result leaves residual risk; panel content and ancestry-related limitations matter.
REPRODUCTIVE GENETICS / FIRST RELEASE 0.13
We separate carrier screening, NIPT, invasive diagnosis, PGT and newborn screening. The atlas shows purpose, confirmation and residual risk—without personal probability calculations or reproductive recommendations.
one word—‘test’—can hide different questions
chance requires confirmation
informed choice remains with people and the clinical team
Only fixed general categories are matched in browser memory against a local editorial map. They are not placed in the URL, cookies, storage, analytics, the controller’s server or an external API. There are no fields for gestational age, name, diagnosis, variant, a child’s result, pedigree or report text.
The navigator shows intended purpose, confirmation needs, residual risk and questions for a specialist. It does not establish the status of an embryo, fetus or child, calculate personal risk, or decide about pregnancy, embryo transfer, an invasive procedure or treatment.
FIVE DIFFERENT SYSTEMS
Results cannot be transferred across stages: adult carrier status, placental cfDNA, fetal cells, embryo biopsy and a newborn dried-blood spot are not the same thing.
FOUR INVARIANT RULES
Screening, diagnostic testing and embryo assessment have different purposes and permissible conclusions.
cfDNA mainly reflects placenta; CVS samples chorionic tissue; amniocentesis samples amniotic-fluid cells; newborn screening is a postnatal population test.
A negative screen lowers chance only for the screened conditions and does not guarantee absence of genetic disease.
A positive screen, no-call or VUS is not a stand-alone basis for an irreversible reproductive or treatment decision.
PROFESSIONAL AND OFFICIAL SOURCES
Links checked 30 August 2026. International guidance does not replace Russian pathways, and a national screening programme does not replace individual diagnosis for a symptomatic child.